Short answer
Four kinds of organisation are excluded by name however much qualifying R&D they do: charities, institutions of higher education, scientific research organisations, and health service bodies. Separately, anything that is not a company for corporation tax purposes is outside the relief altogether — partnerships, limited liability partnerships, sole traders and local authorities. And an otherwise eligible company can still be barred in a particular period by the trade condition, the going concern condition, or a group election.
Applies to
- Schemes
- Merged scheme · ERIS · Legacy SME · Legacy RDEC
- Periods
- 1 April 2000 onwards
- Claimants
- All
Organisations excluded by name
The legislation defines an “ineligible company” and shuts it out of the relief entirely. There are four categories, plus a power for the Treasury to add more by order:
- Charities. A charity cannot claim, whatever it spends on research. This is the exclusion that surprises people most, because charitable research bodies are often doing exactly the kind of work the relief was designed for.
- Institutions of higher education. Universities and the other bodies within the higher education sectors of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.
- Scientific research organisations. Bodies approved under the corporation tax rules for scientific research associations.
- Health service bodies. NHS bodies as defined in the corporation tax legislation.
A trading subsidiary of an excluded body is a different entity and is not itself excluded. A charity’s wholly-owned trading company can claim in its own right if it meets the ordinary conditions — but where the charity funds the subsidiary’s work, the separate questions of contracted-out and subsidised R&D decide whether there is anything left to claim on. That analysis, not the ineligible-company rule, is where these claims usually fail.
Structures that are outside the relief
R&D relief is a corporation tax relief, so it reaches only entities within the charge to corporation tax:
| Structure | Can it claim? |
|---|---|
| Company limited by shares | Yes, if the ordinary conditions are met |
| Company limited by guarantee (not a charity) | Yes, if the ordinary conditions are met |
| Community interest company | Yes, if the ordinary conditions are met |
| Sole trader | No |
| Ordinary partnership | No |
| Limited liability partnership | No |
| Local authority, or a local authority association | No |
| Overseas company with no UK permanent establishment | No |
Where R&D is carried on inside a partnership or an LLP that has corporate members, the relief is not simply unavailable — but it is not available to the partnership, and the position of each corporate member has to be worked out separately. Treat any promoter proposal built on an LLP structure with suspicion until that analysis has been done.
Companies that are eligible but cannot claim this period
Being an eligible company is not the end of it. Four situations stop a claim in a particular accounting period:
You are not trading yet. The merged scheme credit requires a trade in the accounting period. A pre-trading company cannot claim it. The only route for pre-trading expenditure is the ERIS pre-trading election, which is open to loss-making SMEs that meet the R&D intensity condition.
You are not a going concern. For the reformed reliefs, the condition looks at your latest published accounts and at whether you are in administration or liquidation. Under ERIS, failing it stops the claim; under the merged scheme, the credit is computed but the payable element is withheld.
A group election has made you ineligible. Since 1 April 2024, two companies in the same group can jointly elect that one of them is treated as an ineligible company for R&D contracted out to it by the other. The effect is to move the claim to the contracting company. It is elective and revocable, and it is easy to forget that a company has been put on the wrong side of it.
You are in the wrong scheme for the expenditure. For periods beginning before 1 April 2024, an SME whose R&D was subsidised or contracted out to it could not claim that expenditure under the SME scheme, though it could often claim under RDEC. That is a restriction on which relief applies rather than on who the company is, and it still governs open legacy years.
Expenditure that cannot be claimed even by an eligible company
Two exclusions operate on the spending rather than the claimant, and both are commonly mistaken for eligibility problems:
- Capital expenditure. R&D tax relief covers revenue expenditure deductible against the trade. Capital spending on R&D is dealt with by research and development allowances instead.
- Expenditure attributable to an exempt foreign permanent establishment. Where a company has elected for the foreign branch exemption, expenditure brought into account for that branch is outside the relief.
Worked example
Illustrative. A medical research charity with a wholly-owned trading subsidiary. The charity employs the scientists. The subsidiary sells diagnostic kits developed from the research and gift-aids its profits back.
| Entity | Doing qualifying R&D? | Can claim? |
|---|---|---|
| The charity | Yes | No — a charity is an ineligible company |
| The trading subsidiary | Some development work, in-house | Yes, in principle |
The subsidiary’s own development spending is claimable if it meets the ordinary conditions. Where the charity funds work the subsidiary carries out, the question becomes whether that expenditure is contracted out to the subsidiary or subsidised, and the answer decides whether it survives into the claim. Structuring the group so that the eligible entity both bears the cost and takes the risk is a decision to take before the work starts, not at the point of claiming.
Where claims go wrong
- Claiming through the charity because that is where the researchers are. The exclusion is absolute and is checked at the front of an enquiry. The entity that does the work is not always the entity that can claim, and moving the activity after the event does not fix a period already spent.
- Assuming a not-for-profit is a charity. Community interest companies and companies limited by guarantee are not charities unless registered as such. Many are perfectly good claimants and are talked out of claiming by their own accountants.
- Filing a claim for a company in administration. It fails the going concern condition. The time to file is before the appointment, and that is often possible if someone thinks about it.
- Missing a group ineligibility election. It sits in a written notice to HMRC, not on the tax return, so it does not show up in the papers a new adviser is given. Ask.
- Treating an LLP as claimable because it has corporate members. The LLP is not a claimant. Whether the members have anything is a separate, harder question, and it has to be answered before anyone files.
Last reviewed 30 August 2026